Skip to main content

Exciting Life Updates

by
I know I haven’t been updating this blog because I’m too lazy. Years 2 and 3 have been an exciting flurry of business (both work and busy-ness). I constantly spew bite-sized thoughts that stream into my mind on Instagram Stories anyway, and I am remarkably easily bored and excitable, so longer, more considered pieces on Blogger aren’t sustainable. I digress. Many exciting life updates! I’m now officially done with my undergraduate PPE programme at King’s College London. I loved every bit of it: the depth, rigour and intellectual intensity of the course, the international student community, the bustling city of London and all the travel opportunities around Europe. Words can’t do justice to the profundity of the experience. In typical Quincean fashion, I milked everything I could out of the three years: went to Cumberland Lodge (for free) as a photographer with the Philosophy Department in Years 1 and 3, clinched the Principal’s Global Leadership Award (PGLA) in my second year (spending
Post a Comment

As Year 1 Semester 1 Ends

Image
by

Tomorrow’s my Comparative Political Systems (CPS) exam. Well, it’s technically today since it’s 2:30 am now. It’s a 24-hour take-home exam, so I am not particularly worried about it. I don’t regularly maintain this blog; I write whenever I get into a literary mood, and that happens to be now. It’s a season of change: the start of 2022, a new semester, the four-month-old Londoner that I am realising that almost half the academic year is gone.

Semester 1 flew by with moderate success, although I haven’t definitively wrapped it up yet (looking at you, exams). Using just my KI knowledge, extra reading during NS and six years’ worth of research skills I picked up in Hwa Chong, I clinched an 80/100 for my Political and Economic Philosophy (PEP) summative essay on Isaiah Berlin:

Instructor’s Feedback: The author has produced an outstanding piece of work. It is philosophically rigorous, well-argued, and innovative. It reaches well beyond the set texts into the academic debate, and buttresses itself appropriately with references to relevant accompanying philosophical literature. The author’s usage of thought experiments to illustrate their points also demonstrates impressive sophistication and originality of thought. In terms of improving going forward: Firstly I note that the discussion of negative liberty starts to slip into freedom as having options and away from freedom from interference by other persons. For example in the discussion of ‘externalist’ view confinement can arise in circumstances not caused by the interference of other persons (e.g. think of a paraplegic or someone trapped in a cave with food/water). Secondly the author covers a lot of terrain very quickly in moving between Taylor, MacCallum and Dimova-Cookson before concluding that MacCallum is to be preferred. Given MacCallum bears the weight of the author’s conclusions more time should have been devoted to this part of the essay. Still, very well done!

Of course, 胜不骄，败不馁. But hell yeah, ka-ching! Now the challenge is to maintain it. Sigh.

Life is quite good. I’m really fortunate to be living in Urbanest City, which is a brand new student accommodation in a convenient location: between Aldgate and Tower Hill. Whenever I feel lonely, the liveliness of London cheers me back up. The world is so globalised, home is never far away. Last week, I bought a pack of Trung Nguyen G7 3-in-1 coffee for £3. I have been surviving on my Pret a Manger subscription but after four months, I gave in; hazelnut cappuccinos can’t beat a good strong dose of Southeast Asian coffee with condensed milk, even if it comes in a sachet. Anyway, there are quite a few Malaysian/Thai restaurants in Spitalfields, just a 20-minute walk away. I’ve only tried Rosa’s Thai Café so far, and it’s not bad.

Last weekend, a new flatmate, Jack, moved in next door. Our three-room flat is finally full: Pavan (computer science), me (PPE), and now Jack (business), who is on exchange this semester. Most of my friends here at King’s College London are international students. Among them, a few cherished philosophical interlocutors. KCL follows the Oxford model with a touch more flexibility: pick and choose modules as you wish from among Philosophy, Politics and Economics (and other departments too) with one or two interdisciplinary/integrated modules to tie things together. Because of my previous background of KI and H3 Math in Hwa Chong, I already knew which sub-disciplines I wanted to focus on, making our “buffet” style of PPE more suited to me than the more applied programmes at UCL and NUS which focus heavily on prescribed sets of interdisciplinary/integrated modules.

Oh wow, it’s already 3:15 am. Good night. ∎

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of "This I Fear Most" by Ng Yi-Sheng

by
When I first found this gem of a poem in "A Book of Hims", I knew it would be my favourite for a long time. The poem is so sweet, it's ridiculous. If Ed Sheeran's "Perfect" was a sonnet, this would be it. This I Fear Most Ng Yi-Sheng That I am not a light to guide you home, No shining beacon and no candle flame. That I am but a ragged burden thrown Against the bony shoulders of your frame, And every path you tread into the night I do encumber. That I do mistake That sunny grin for spirit and delight, Though it is worn to better bear the ache. This I fear most. So I command you: should You tire of me, strip me from your back And burn me like a hecatomb of wood. With raging heat, the heavens I’ll attack Until the dark dissolves away like foam. Then step ahead. My light shall guide you home. Analysis "This I Fear Most" by Ng Yi-Sheng is a Shakespearean sonnet about the selfless nature of love and the re
Post a Comment
Continue Reading »

H2 Knowledge and Inquiry (KI): Should You Take It?

by
Choosing your A Level subject combination can be quite a nerve-racking experience, especially if you don't have any strong interest in particular subjects. The stakes are high too: it's the A Levels, the culmination of 12 years of formal education. No one wants to screw up and pick the wrong combination that will lead to 2 years of extra suffering. I faced the same problem after I graduated from the High School section. Physics, Math, Literature and KI was the combination of my dreams, but it wasn't a standard combination the College section offered. I made a compromise and chose the closest combination on the standard list: KI, Literature, Math and Economics (KILME). When I tell people I take KILME, they usually respond with confusion or shock. "Harh, simi combi is that?" "You take KI?!?!?!" These reactions are basically caused by the mystery that is KI. It's a phantom subject: one that has no textbook, no published notes,
2 comments
Continue Reading »

Hume on Reason and the Passions — A Reply to Zizai

by
The Awkward Yeti on Facebook I thank  Cui Zizai  — my old friend, former classmate, collaborator and interlocutor — for this opportunity to revisit Hume. Zizai sent me an email (one of his periodic circulars on mathematics, politics and philosophy) regarding his take on Hume, in particular the infamous line “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” in Hume’s  A Treatise of Human Nature (“ Treatise ”). Sent 1:28 am, 26 December 2020 (UTC+08:00) Zizai has two concerns which I shall attempt to address: Is the bipartite claim “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” is–ought fallacious? Does Hume offer an argument for his “ought” claim? How can it be justified? Is the bipartite claim “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” is–ought fallacious? Let us refer to Hume’s introduction of the is–ought problem ( Treatise  3.1.1.27 ): I cannot forbear adding to these reasonings an observation, which may, perhaps, be found of some importance.
2 comments
Continue Reading »