Skip to main content

Exciting Life Updates

by
I know I haven’t been updating this blog because I’m too lazy. Years 2 and 3 have been an exciting flurry of business (both work and busy-ness). I constantly spew bite-sized thoughts that stream into my mind on Instagram Stories anyway, and I am remarkably easily bored and excitable, so longer, more considered pieces on Blogger aren’t sustainable. I digress. Many exciting life updates! I’m now officially done with my undergraduate PPE programme at King’s College London. I loved every bit of it: the depth, rigour and intellectual intensity of the course, the international student community, the bustling city of London and all the travel opportunities around Europe. Words can’t do justice to the profundity of the experience. In typical Quincean fashion, I milked everything I could out of the three years: went to Cumberland Lodge (for free) as a photographer with the Philosophy Department in Years 1 and 3, clinched the Principal’s Global Leadership Award (PGLA) in my second year (spending
Post a Comment

The Pestilence of Spring

Image
by
  • April is the cruellest month, breeding
    Lilacs out of the dead land, mixing
    Memory and desire, stirring
    Dull roots with spring rain.
    Winter kept us warm, covering
    Earth in forgetful snow, feeding
    A little life with dried tubers.
April has come, with pestilence. T. S. Eliot’s iconic lines speak so powerfully now. The continuous tense hangs on the edge of each line, unresolved, imploring you to read on dreadfully. The contradictions confuse. You ask yourself, bewildered: When will this end?

This week has been a whirlwind of activity. I finally delivered my jurisprudence presentation on Monday. It brought me much pride and joy because I had burnt my weekend working on it. I also completed my final IPPT on Tuesday morning. Then on Tuesday night, we were told to pack up and stay at home for the rest of the week. Whoosh.

Staying at home feels like the OBS Solo again. It also makes me remember my Junior College days when I spent 12 hours every day revising for the A Levels, sat on the exact same desk I am sitting at now. The rain beat down hard on my window yesterday, adding to the cosy atmosphere, reminding me of the student I once was and what I had stood for. There is some remarkable continuity after all, haha.

Last week, I wanted to write a detailed response to my former schoolmate Ted Ang’s forum piece in Lianhe Zaobao, but I never resolved to do so. This short paragraph shall be my condensed reply. Ang draws a distinction between “free speech” and “speaking freely”, and associates the former with “Western liberalism”. To Ang, “free speech” focuses on “free[dom]” and refers to unbridled expression, whereas “speaking freely” focuses on “speaking” and refers to responsible speech and its concomitant epistemic, alethic and civic norms. He advocates the suppression of the former and the flourishing of the latter. You know me: I think that regardless of liberalism’s merits and demerits, its supposed “Westernness” is a red herring. I don’t believe in ideological essentialism and dichotomous caricatures of East versus West. Ideas should be judged based on their merit — not where they came from — and we can (and should) pick and choose. Liberalism as Ang has construed is not characteristically “Western” anyway; and even it it is, it must be located precisely along the meandering river of Western thought, for it means different things in different places and epochs. Moreover, Ang does not give any policy recommendations, which calls into question the extent to which “free speech” and “speaking freely” can be separately addressed. Fundamentally, I contend that “free speech” and “speaking freely” may be conceptually distinct but practically inseparable, and thus Ang’s distinction is merely a syntactical sleight of hand confined to the realm of relations of ideas.

On Wednesday afternoon, I messaged the HP WhatsApp group and asked if anyone was free for a video chat. Cui Zizai called me on Skype last night. Zizai maintains The Pursuit of Truth and Beauty, a quirky blog that is unmistakably his. He is now a rising sophomore at Duke taking graduate-level mathematics, psychology, neuroscience, linguistics, and political science courses. We talked about how COVID-19 is playing out in the United States and how college life has changed as a result. He has been trying new recipes with his electric rice cooker. Stories of his exciting academic life make me squeal inside yet again: I really, really cannot wait to go to university.

May my pen too never falter. ∎

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Analysis of "This I Fear Most" by Ng Yi-Sheng

by
When I first found this gem of a poem in "A Book of Hims", I knew it would be my favourite for a long time. The poem is so sweet, it's ridiculous. If Ed Sheeran's "Perfect" was a sonnet, this would be it. This I Fear Most Ng Yi-Sheng That I am not a light to guide you home, No shining beacon and no candle flame. That I am but a ragged burden thrown Against the bony shoulders of your frame, And every path you tread into the night I do encumber. That I do mistake That sunny grin for spirit and delight, Though it is worn to better bear the ache. This I fear most. So I command you: should You tire of me, strip me from your back And burn me like a hecatomb of wood. With raging heat, the heavens I’ll attack Until the dark dissolves away like foam. Then step ahead. My light shall guide you home. Analysis "This I Fear Most" by Ng Yi-Sheng is a Shakespearean sonnet about the selfless nature of love and the re
Post a Comment
Continue Reading »

H2 Knowledge and Inquiry (KI): Should You Take It?

by
Choosing your A Level subject combination can be quite a nerve-racking experience, especially if you don't have any strong interest in particular subjects. The stakes are high too: it's the A Levels, the culmination of 12 years of formal education. No one wants to screw up and pick the wrong combination that will lead to 2 years of extra suffering. I faced the same problem after I graduated from the High School section. Physics, Math, Literature and KI was the combination of my dreams, but it wasn't a standard combination the College section offered. I made a compromise and chose the closest combination on the standard list: KI, Literature, Math and Economics (KILME). When I tell people I take KILME, they usually respond with confusion or shock. "Harh, simi combi is that?" "You take KI?!?!?!" These reactions are basically caused by the mystery that is KI. It's a phantom subject: one that has no textbook, no published notes,
2 comments
Continue Reading »

Hume on Reason and the Passions — A Reply to Zizai

by
The Awkward Yeti on Facebook I thank  Cui Zizai  — my old friend, former classmate, collaborator and interlocutor — for this opportunity to revisit Hume. Zizai sent me an email (one of his periodic circulars on mathematics, politics and philosophy) regarding his take on Hume, in particular the infamous line “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” in Hume’s  A Treatise of Human Nature (“ Treatise ”). Sent 1:28 am, 26 December 2020 (UTC+08:00) Zizai has two concerns which I shall attempt to address: Is the bipartite claim “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” is–ought fallacious? Does Hume offer an argument for his “ought” claim? How can it be justified? Is the bipartite claim “reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions” is–ought fallacious? Let us refer to Hume’s introduction of the is–ought problem ( Treatise  3.1.1.27 ): I cannot forbear adding to these reasonings an observation, which may, perhaps, be found of some importance.
2 comments
Continue Reading »